Does this sound familiar?
The gap between knowing ML exists and knowing when to use it
You've read the articles. You understand that gradient boosting outperforms linear regression on noisy data. But when a colleague shares a model's AUC score, you're not sure what question to ask next — or whether the metric even matters for the use case.
That gap isn't about intelligence or effort. It's about exposure. Finance professionals who close it describe a specific moment: the first time they catch a flaw in someone else's model before it gets deployed.
A typical workshop moment
Halfway through module 4, participants work with a credit-scoring dataset that has a hidden target leak. Most catch it by the second hour — not because they memorized a rule, but because they've started asking the right questions about data collection timing.